Biological and genetical consequences of radiation effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/2218-7979-2014-7-2-46-48Keywords:
radiation, radiation contamination, radioactivity, ecology, mutation animalsAbstract
Biologically and genetically consequences of radiation action. Consequences which emanation influence causes in a live organisms in particular could be classified by different ways depending mainly from the size of received doze. These consequences of radiation we shall enumerate in following order: changes in somatic cells leading to cancer appearance; genetic mutations rendering influence on future generations; influence on germ and fetus as a consequence of mother’s radiation during period of pregnancy; death exactly at moment of radiation. Biological consequences are: changes in organism’s cells leading to cancer appearance and mutations in sexual cells rendering influence on future generations. They are the most frequently connected with situation when huge number of people are influenced by small doses of radiation during expositions at medical aims or as a result of work on atomic electricity stations. Influence of radiation on developing germs or fruit presents itself special case worth of special discussion.References
1. Dubinin N.P. et. al. The human genes found and environmental mutagens. // UdSSR Academy of Science. – 1990. – No. 1. – pp. 19-31.
2. Bigaliev A.B. et. al. Assessment of environmental pollution effects and consequences / risk on biota and public health // V-congress VS Genetics and Selection. – Moscow, 2009. – P. 372.
3. Bigaliev A.B., Bigaliev A.A. Radiation genetic and ecology problems in Kazakhstan at the environment polluted condition // Medical journal.
– 2007. – No. 7. – pp. 11-16.
4. Bigaliev A.B. et. al. Mutagenic effects of radiation and prognosis of the inherited pathology of the population of the regions adjoining to the former Semipalatinsk nuclear tests site // The materials of international conference of Genetics Society of China (Synzjan University. 25-27 August). – China, 2007. – P.148.
5. Bochkov N.P., Kuleshov N.P. et al., Population cytogenetic investigation of newborns in Moscow // Humangenetik. – 1975. – No. 22 (2). – pp. 39-52.
6. Shevchenko V.A., Ramaya L.K., Pomerantseva M.D. Genetic effect of J-131 reproductive cells of male mice // Mutation Res. – 1989. – V. 226. – No.1. – Р. 87-91.
7. Pilinskaya M.A., Dibskiy S.S., Dibskaya E.B., Shvaiko L.I. Radiation-induced modification of human somatic cells’ chromosome sensitivity
to the testing mutagenic exposure of bleomycin in vitro in lung cancer patients in delayed terms following chernobyl accident // Cytol. Genet. – 2012. – No. 46 (6). – pp. 360-365.
8. Sniigiryova G.P., Lubchenko P.N. et. al. 20 years after the Chernobyl accident Present and future // Gematology and Transfuziology. – 1994. – Vol. 39(3). – pp. 19-21.
9. Atsushi Sofuni The current potential of highintensity focused ultrasound for pancreatic carcinoma // Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. – 2014. – No. 9. – pp. 295-303.
10. Hudoley V.V. Gens and ferments for metabolic activation in chemical carcinogenesis // J. Ecological genetics, S-kt Pitsburg. – 2003. – No. 1.
– pp. 30-35.
11. Antushevich A.E. et al. Changes in the system of cyclic nucleotides in tissues of the irradiated body // Tsitologiya. – 1988. – No. 27. – pp. 233-236.
2. Bigaliev A.B. et. al. Assessment of environmental pollution effects and consequences / risk on biota and public health // V-congress VS Genetics and Selection. – Moscow, 2009. – P. 372.
3. Bigaliev A.B., Bigaliev A.A. Radiation genetic and ecology problems in Kazakhstan at the environment polluted condition // Medical journal.
– 2007. – No. 7. – pp. 11-16.
4. Bigaliev A.B. et. al. Mutagenic effects of radiation and prognosis of the inherited pathology of the population of the regions adjoining to the former Semipalatinsk nuclear tests site // The materials of international conference of Genetics Society of China (Synzjan University. 25-27 August). – China, 2007. – P.148.
5. Bochkov N.P., Kuleshov N.P. et al., Population cytogenetic investigation of newborns in Moscow // Humangenetik. – 1975. – No. 22 (2). – pp. 39-52.
6. Shevchenko V.A., Ramaya L.K., Pomerantseva M.D. Genetic effect of J-131 reproductive cells of male mice // Mutation Res. – 1989. – V. 226. – No.1. – Р. 87-91.
7. Pilinskaya M.A., Dibskiy S.S., Dibskaya E.B., Shvaiko L.I. Radiation-induced modification of human somatic cells’ chromosome sensitivity
to the testing mutagenic exposure of bleomycin in vitro in lung cancer patients in delayed terms following chernobyl accident // Cytol. Genet. – 2012. – No. 46 (6). – pp. 360-365.
8. Sniigiryova G.P., Lubchenko P.N. et. al. 20 years after the Chernobyl accident Present and future // Gematology and Transfuziology. – 1994. – Vol. 39(3). – pp. 19-21.
9. Atsushi Sofuni The current potential of highintensity focused ultrasound for pancreatic carcinoma // Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. – 2014. – No. 9. – pp. 295-303.
10. Hudoley V.V. Gens and ferments for metabolic activation in chemical carcinogenesis // J. Ecological genetics, S-kt Pitsburg. – 2003. – No. 1.
– pp. 30-35.
11. Antushevich A.E. et al. Changes in the system of cyclic nucleotides in tissues of the irradiated body // Tsitologiya. – 1988. – No. 27. – pp. 233-236.
Downloads
Published
2014-12-28
How to Cite
Shametov, A. K., R. K. Bigalieva, E. T. Zhamburshin, B. E. Shymshikov, A. C. Kulumbetov, Z. K. Idrisova, and A. B. Bigaliev. 2014. “Biological and Genetical Consequences of Radiation Effects”. International Journal of Biology and Chemistry 7 (2):46-48. https://doi.org/10.26577/2218-7979-2014-7-2-46-48.
Issue
Section
Biology
License
ааа
