Biological dosimetry and unbiased assessment of detrimental radiation effect on humans
considering the information of values of physical analytical changes to be sufficient. This short excursus on the substantiation of the biodosimetry role was made in order to remind radioecologists that the issue
of radiation danger must be primarily based on the assessment of its negative effect on the human genetic apparatus. The relevance of biodosimetry has increased upon identification of a new effect – radiationinduced genome instability resulting in remote consequences demonstrated as de novo through the number of subsequent generations. Any extrapolations of the findings of physical environmental measurements, or even the data obtained in different animals, are not acceptable. Each of them has its own role in the assessment of radiation effect. We think that protection of human health and life is of highest importance.
Full Text:PDF (Russian)
I.B. Mosse // Radiation Biology. Radioecology, 2002, V.42, No.6, P. 661-664;
Methodological guideline. Methods for Analysis of Chromosome Aberrations in Humans. WHO, Geneva, 1975, p. 64.
Biological dosimetry: chromosomal aberration analysis for dose assessment // IAEA Techn. Report Series, 1986, No.260, Vienna
Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment: a manual // Technic Report Ser. No.405, Viena, IAEA, 2001, 127p.
Bender M.A., Gooch P.C. // PNAS (USA), 1962, V.48, P.522-532
Bajerska A., Liniecki J. // Mutat. Res., 1975, V.27, P.271-284
Schmid E., Bauchinger M. e.a. // Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 1974, V.26, P.31-37
A.V. Sevankayev, A.P. Nassonov. // Med. Radiology, 1978, V.23, No.6, P.26-33
Lejeune J., Berger R., Jankowski J. //Ann. Genet., 1967, V.10, P.118-123
Ye.K. Pyatkin, A.Ye. Baranov // Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Radiation Biology Series, M, VINITI, 1980, V.3, P.103-179
M. Bender// in book Guideline on Radiation Haematology, M., 1974, P.231-239
UNSCEAR. //Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation, 1969, Suppl. 13, N.Y., 165pp.
N.A. Maznik, V.A. Binnikov, V.S. Maznik// Radiobiology. Radioecology, 2003, V.43, No.4, P.412-419
A.S. Sayenko, I.A. Zamulyaeva, R.G. Smirnova and other// Radiobiology. Radioecology, 1998, V.38, Issue 2, P.171-180
T.N. Obukhova, Ye.K. Domracheva//Radiobiology. Radioecology,1998, V.38, Issue 6, P.793-799
I.Ye. Vorobtsova, J.Tacker, N.M. Timofeyeva et al. // Radiobiology. Radioecology, 2000, V.40, No.2, P.142-148
Biological dosimetry for persons irradiated by the Chernobyl accident // International scientific collaboration on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident (1991-1995), Final report.
Radiation and Pathology. Edited by A.F. Tsyb, M., High School, 2005, 341 p.
M.A. Pilinskaya, A.M. Shemetun, R.S. Dybskiy et al. // Radiobiology, 1992, Vol. 32, Issue 5, P.632-664
M.A. Pilinskaya, S.S. Dibski // Int. J. Radiat. Med. 2000, Vol. 1, No.5, P. 83-95
M.A. Pilinskaya, R.S. Dibski // Cytology and Genetics, 2001. – No. 4. – P.50-54
N.A. Maznik, V.A. Vinnikov // Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2005. – V.45. – No.6. – P.700-708
A.V. Sevankayev, Ye.V. Golub, I.K. Khvostunov, O.I. Potetnya et al. // Radiation Biology. RRadioecology. 2004. – V.44. – No.6. – P.637-652